A Conservative Tumblog

Jan 21 2012

disdainfullyyours asked: sorry for being ignorant, but what IS a factor in morality, and therefore rights, if not the sentience of the being?

Don’t apologize.  As long as you’re still willing to learn, you’re still miles ahead of most people.

I’ve written about it before if you need me to go from the beginning, but for now I’ll stick to the brass tacks.

Rights come from rationality. That’s not to be confused with emotions or consciousness or the ability to feel pain—but rationality. The ability to reason. The ability to perceive the world around us and not just identify it, but to understand what it is. And when it comes to the Living World, human beings are the only rational creatures on the block. The only ones. We are the only ones with rights—with a “dignity” that is capable of being morally infringed. (And please, spare me the “plenty of humans are irrational” argument. It’s nonsense. There are plenty of humans who act in an irrational fashion. That does not make them non-rational beings.)

Humankind transcended the animal kingdom—because we ceased to be bound by the natural world. We can do better. Instead of the letting the world define our parameters, we defined our own parameters for the world. We don’t have full control yet—like, we can’t stop a hurricane (yet!) but our crops aren’t dependent on the rain for water, our homes aren’t dependent on the sun for heat, etc etc. Animals can be trained and domesticated—but that’s only thanks to our intervention. Plants can be grown in an underground lab, devoid of sunlight or natural air, because we can control its atmosphere. And that—all of it—is thanks to our rational capacity. A capacity that every other creature on this planet lacks.

3 notes

+

disdainfullyyours asked: would you mind outlining, roughly, why you think animals have no (or should have no) rights? i've not seen many arguments from that side of the debate and am not entirely taken with the pro-animal rights arguments, so felt i needed a differing-from-the-majority opinion

Animal rights ideology holds that moral worth comes with sentience or the ability to suffer. Thus, since both animals and humans feel pain, animal rights advocates believe that what is done to an animal should be judged morally as if it were done to a human being. This is, of course, false. Morality has nothing to do with sentience, emotional capacity, suffering, or the ability to feel pain. Nothing whatsoever. This is the common misunderstanding that most people have with regard to morality in general—not just as it applies to animal rights.

2 notes

+
+

quietly-living-life asked: Why be pro-life? I mean, do you know what hyperemesis gravidarum, pre-eclampsia, and ectopic pregnancies are? Do you know how physically hellish pregnancy can be for a woman? Do you know all of the different ways that pregnancy can cause mental and emotional distress to a woman? Do you know how emotionally scarring it can be to give a child up for adoption? Or do you just not care about any of that, which proves that your views on this issue are incredibly hateful?

First off—and I’ve said this a thousand times before—I’m not pro-life. Or pro-choice. I am anti-abortion. Important distinction if you care more about the facts than feeling like part of some silly little social club.

To answer your questions: Yes. Not from personal experience, but yes. Yes. Yes. And, as any intellectually honest person would have to answer to your last question, no, I don’t care. But I think you’re a little confused—since when does not kowtowing to cheap emotional appeals or letting them get in the way of real principles make a position hateful?

This was obviously intended to be some kind of hit-and-run thing, but if you have an answer, I’d like to know. And if you’re at all interested in actually understanding my position (as you obviously haven’t read more than a few sentences on it—at the most), the abortion tag would be a good place to start.

5 notes

Dec 05 2011

Anonymous asked: Damn right. I always like getting my hard hitting analysis of the problems facing the world from a guy who is famous for making boob and fart jokes.I think the first step is to abolish child labor laws . Daddy needs his widgets.

I don’t think there is a first step, Anon. I don’t think it matters what we do at this point. We could fix the broken system all we want—return people’s economic rights and personal liberties; abolish the public mandatory state-sponsored indoctrination camps; gut the federal government; deregulate all the stuff that needs deregulating; take the eyes out of the sky; slash public welfare and social services—I don’t think it’ll help. The problem is ideological.

The problem is that we’ve got two entire generations raised exclusively on collectivist notions, who have been so saturated with them that that no traces of individual rationalism is left; who have been conditioned, almost in a Pavlovian fashion, to emotionally react and automatically dismiss anything that is in any way contrary to it. I mean, look—with your flippant reply, you just did exactly that. And, of course, we see this kind of thing constantly from the more prominent self-proclaimed liberals/progressives/socialists/collectivists on this site.

So, I don’t know man—I don’t think that’ll help. I don’t think there is a solution. Not one that will continue to permit the co-existence of these two fundamentally competing ideologies. Or, in simpler terms (for all you liberals here): it doesn’t matter if you fix a broken blender, when the person using it is trying to make toast.

2 notes

Dec 02 2011

Adam Carolla, in 10 minutes, sums up pretty much everything I’ve ever said on this site (and anywhere else) about: liberals, rich vs. poor, entitlement-mentality, handouts, bailouts, Islamic terrorism, Occupy Whatever, public education, self-esteem programs, trophies for everyone, and why this society has gone to hell. And, frankly, why I think it can’t recover. Why it’ll never recover when we’re saddled with an entire generation (two, actually, if you really think about it) that were incorrectly raised and indoctrinated with a false collectivist ideology.

I won’t spoil any of it for you but to say that what he’s talking about… it is the end result of progressivism. This is what any sane, rational person could see coming a mile away when any progressivist touted their ideology and its practical application. This is it pointed out, in the bluntest terms possible, why progressivism got exactly what it asked for—and why society paid the price for their idiocy.

Careful if you’re at work. It’s loaded with profanity.

(He even used my term: snowglobes.)

43 notes

Nov 16 2011
Nov 04 2011

The 99% includes:

  • Communist Party USA (Sources: Communist Party USA, OWS speech, The Daily Caller)
  • American Nazi Party (Sources: Media Matters, American Nazi Party, White Honor, Sunshine State News)
  • Ayatollah Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran (Sources: The Guardian, Tehran Times, CBS News)
  • Barack Obama (Sources: ABC News, CBS News, ForexTV, NBC New York)
  • The government of North Korea (Sources: Korean Central News Agency (North Korean state-controlled news outlet), The Marxist-Leninist, Wall Street Journal, Times of India)
  • Louis Farrakhan, Nation of Islam (Sources: Black in America, Weasel Zippers, Philadelphia Weekly)
  • Revolutionary Communist Party (Sources: Revolutionary Communist Party, Revolution newspaper, in-person appearance)
  • David Duke (Sources: Talking Points Memo, video statement, davidduke.com)
  • Joe Biden (Sources: Talking Points Memo, video statement, Mother Jones)
  • Hugo Chavez (Sources: Mother Jones, Reuters, Examiner.com)
  • Revolutionary Guards of Iran (Sources: Associated Press, FARS News Agency, UPI)
  • Black Panthers (original) (Sources: in-person appearance, Occupy Oakland, Oakland Tribune)
  • Socialist Party USA (Sources: Socialist Party USA, IndyMedia, The Daily Caller)
  • US Border Guard (Sources: White Reference, www.usborderguard.com, Gateway Pundit, Just Another Day blog)
  • Industrial Workers of the World (Sources: IWW web site, iww.org, in-person appearances)
  • CAIR (Sources: in-person appearance, Washington Post, CAIR, CAIR New York)
  • Nancy Pelosi (Sources: Talking Points Memo, video statement, ABC News, The Weekly Standard)
  • Communist Party of China (Sources: People’s Daily (Communist Party organ), Reuters, chinataiwan.org, The Telegraph)
  • Hezbollah (Sources: almoqawama.org, MailFilterGateway has detected a possible fraud attempt from “almoqawama.org” claiming to be almoqawama.org (2), MailFilterGateway has detected a possible fraud attempt from “almoqawama.org” claiming to be almoqawama.org (3), wikipedia)
  • 9/11Truth.org (Sources: MailFilterGateway has detected a possible fraud attempt from “www.911truth.org” claiming to be 911truth.org (1), MailFilterGateway has detected a possible fraud attempt from “www.911truth.org” claiming to be 911truth.org (2), MailFilterGateway has detected a possible fraud attempt from “www.911truth.org” claiming to be 911truth.org (3))
  • International Bolshevik Tendency (Sources: bolshevik.org, Wire Magazine)
  • International Socialist Organization (Sources: Socialist Worker, socialistworker.org, in-person appearance)
  • PressTV (Iranian government outlet) (Sources: PressTV, wikipedia)
  • Marxist Student Union (Sources: Marxist Student Union, Big Government, marxiststudentunion.blogspot.com)
  • Freedom Road Socialist Organization (Sources: FightBack News, fightbacknews.org)
  • ANSWER (Sources: ANSWER press release, ANSWER web site, Xinhua)
  • Party for Socialism and Liberation (Sources: Liberation News (1), pslweb.org, The Daily Free Press, Liberation News (2))
  • A bunch of self-loathing rich kids.

Just so you know.

14 notes

+

This is socialism.

Haha, who didn’t see this coming? Aww, it’s not as much fun to squat like filthy homeless bums when the temperature drops, is it? Then you really start missing all those evil capitalist products that keep you warm and comfortable, don’t you?

This part cracked me up:

According to an “urgent” alert on their website, OWS is looking for a number of other donations, including waterproof boots, gloves, hats, hand and foot warmers and disposable foot covers among other things. The site says the protesters “are in need of emergency supplies crucial for cold weather survival (and occupation).”

Or, you know, you could just go back to your parents’ basements where it’s warm and safe and you’ll end up anyway, and quit your silly little nonsense “protest” posturing already.

“WE ARE THE 99%! WE REJECT CAPITALISM AND BIG CORPORATIONS! But… y’know, if you could hook us up with some of those nifty hand warmers and waterproof boots, that’d be awesome. NO I DON’T WANT TO KNOW WHERE THEY CAME FROM, JUST GIVE THEM TO ME!”

But yeah, mockery aside there’s something important to take from all this. This is socialism:

It’s a ramshackle tent city filled with useless dependents who will all ultimately starve or freeze to death, wholly dependent on someone else to provide them food, clothing, shelter and warmth in order to survive, unless they go running back to the joys and luxuries that capitalism creates.

I seriously, truly hope and wish that a handful of them die from exposure. It’s a terrible thing to wish on people, but these goddamned morons need to get a clue. And, since people like that always insist on learning things the hard way—let them get a firsthand lesson. Show them the frozen corpse that is the invariable end result of the ideology they are advocating.

Seriously. To any socialist or any liberal jackhole defending these morons, how do you not understand this? You have firsthand proof of what the end result of socialism is. You can see it on Wall Street. It’s this. It’s people freezing in the cold with nowhere to go (without admitting the ideological supremacy of that which they’re “protesting”) who are now literally begging people to take care of them so that they don’t die. Because they cannot take care of themselves. At all.

That’s socialism, folks.

Who here is still stupid enough to continue supporting that ridiculous ideology, now seeing it for what it is in stark naked contrast? Anyone?

27 notes

Oct 29 2011

Anonymous asked: When does human life begin?

Apparently, it begins sometime after people decide to abort.

Funny how that works out for them.

9 notes

Page 1 of 51